%                               Stats intro for Applied Stat I
% Notes and comments at the end

% \documentclass[serif]{beamer} % Serif for Computer Modern math font.
\documentclass[serif, handout]{beamer} % Handout mode to ignore pause statements
\hypersetup{colorlinks,linkcolor=,urlcolor=red}


%  To create handout using article mode: Comment above and uncomment below (2 places)
%\documentclass[12pt]{article}
%\usepackage{beamerarticle}
%\usepackage[colorlinks=true, pdfstartview=FitV, linkcolor=blue, citecolor=blue, urlcolor=red]{hyperref}   
     % For live Web links with href in article mode
%\usepackage{fullpage}
 

\usefonttheme{serif} % Looks like Computer Modern for non-math text -- nice!
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} % Supress navigation symbols
% \usetheme{Berlin} % Displays sections on top
\usepackage[english]{babel}
% \definecolor{links}{HTML}{2A1B81}
% \definecolor{links}{red}

\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number] 

\mode<presentation>
% \mode<handout>{\setbeamercolor{background canvas}{bg=black!5}}



\title{Introduction Based on a Simple Example\footnote{See last slide for copyright information.}}
\subtitle{STA442/2101 Fall 2013}
\date{} % To suppress date


\begin{document}

% More material required for handout in article mode
%\title{Introduction Based on a Simple Example\footnote{See last slide for copyright information.}}
%\subtitle{STA442/2101 Fall 2012}
%\date{} % To suppress date
%\maketitle

\begin{frame}
  \titlepage
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Background Reading}
\framesubtitle{Optional} 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Chapter 1 of \emph{Data analysis with SAS}: What's going on and how would you say it to a client?
    \item Chapter 1 of Davison's \emph{Statistical models}: Data, and probability models for data.
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Goal of statistical analysis}

The goal of statistical analysis is to draw reasonable conclusions from noisy numerical data.

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Steps in the process of statistical analysis}
{One approach}

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Consider a fairly realistic example or problem
    \item Decide on a statistical model
    \item Perhaps decide sample size
    \item Acquire data
    \item Examine and clean the data; generate displays and descriptive statistics
    \item Estimate model parameters, perhaps by maximum likelihood
    \item Carry out tests, compute confidence intervals, or both
    \item Perhaps re-consider the model and go back to estimation
    \item Based on the results of estimation and inference, draw conclusions about the example or problem
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{What is a statistical model?}
\framesubtitle{You should always be able to state the model.}

\pause

A \emph{statistical model} is a set of assertions that directly or indirectly specify the probability distribution of the observable data.
 
\pause

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Let $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ be a random sample from a normal distribution with expected value $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$.
    
\pause

    \item For $i=1, \ldots, n$, let $Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_{i1} + \cdots + \beta_k x_{ik} + \epsilon_i$, where
    \begin{itemize}
        \item[] $\beta_0, \ldots, \beta_k$ are unknown constants.
        \item[] $x_{ij}$ are known constants.
        \item[] $\epsilon_1, \ldots, \epsilon_n$ are independent $N(0,\sigma^2)$ random variables.
        \item[] $\sigma^2$ is an unknown constant.
        \item[] $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$ are observable random variables.
    \end{itemize}
  \end{itemize}

\pause

Is the model the same thing as the \emph{truth}?
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Parameter Space}

The \emph{parameter space} is the set of values that can be taken on by the parameter. 

\pause
 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Let $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ be a random sample from a normal distribution with expected value $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. 
\pause    

The parameter space is $\{(\mu,\sigma^2): -\infty < \mu < \infty, \sigma^2 > 0\}$.

\pause

    \item For $i=1, \ldots, n$, let $Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_{i1} + \cdots + \beta_k x_{ik} + \epsilon_i$, where
    \begin{itemize}
        \item[] $\beta_0, \ldots, \beta_k$ are unknown constants.
        \item[] $x_{ij}$ are known constants.
        \item[] $\epsilon_1, \ldots, \epsilon_n$ are independent $N(0,\sigma^2)$ random variables.
        \item[] $\sigma^2$ is an unknown constant.
        \item[] $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$ are observable random variables.
    \end{itemize}

\pause

The parameter space is $\{(\beta_0, \ldots, \beta_k, \sigma^2): -\infty < \beta_j < \infty, \sigma^2 > 0\}$.
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Coffee taste test}
A fast food chain is considering a change in the blend of coffee beans they use to make their coffee. To determine whether their customers prefer the new blend, the company plans to select a random sample of $n=100$ coffee-drinking customers and ask them to taste coffee made with the new blend and with the old blend, in cups marked ``$A$" and ``$B$." Half the time the new blend will be in cup $A$, and half the time it will be in cup $B$. Management wants to know if there is a difference in preference for the two blends.
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Statistical model}
Letting $\theta$ denote the probability that a consumer will choose the new blend, treat the data $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$ as a random sample from a Bernoulli distribution. That is, independently for $i=1, \ldots, n$,
\begin{displaymath}
    P(y_i|\theta) = \theta^{y_i} (1-\theta)^{1-y_i}
\end{displaymath}
for $y_i=0$ or $y_i=1$, and zero otherwise.
% The conditional probability notation is not in the book (I believe).

\vspace{10mm}

\pause

Note that $Y = \sum_{i=1}^n Y_i$ is the number of consumers who choose the new blend. Because $Y \sim B(n,\theta)$, the whole experiment could also be treated as a single observation from a Binomial.

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Find the MLE of $\theta$}{Show your work}

\pause

Denoting the likelihood by $L(\theta)$ and the log likelihood by $\ell(\theta) = \log L(\theta)$, maximize the log likelihood.

\pause

\begin{eqnarray*}
    \frac{\partial\ell}{\partial\theta} 
    & = & \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} \log\left(\prod_{i=1}^n P(y_i|\theta) \right) \\ \pause
    & = & \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} \log\left(\prod_{i=1}^n \theta^{y_i} (1-\theta)^{1-y_i} \right) \\ \pause
    & = & \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta} \log\left(\theta^{\sum_{i=1}^n y_i} 
                                       (1-\theta)^{n-\sum_{i=1}^n y_i}\right) \\ \pause
    & = & \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\left((\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)\log\theta + 
          (n-\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)\log (1-\theta) \right) \\ \pause
    & = & \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n y_i}{\theta} - \frac{n-\sum_{i=1}^n y_i}{1-\theta}
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Setting the derivative to zero and solving}

  \begin{itemize}
    \item $\theta = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n y_i}{n} = \overline{y}$

\pause

    \item Second derivative test: $ \frac{\partial^2\log \ell}{\partial\theta^2} = 
          -n\left(\frac{1-\overline{y}}{(1-\theta)^2} + \frac{\overline{y}}{\theta^2} \right) < 0$

\pause

    \item Concave down, maximum, and the MLE is the sample proportion.
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile] % Note use of fragile to make verbatim work.
\frametitle{Numerical estimate}
Suppose 60 of the 100 consumers prefer the new blend. Give a point estimate of the parameter $\theta$. Your answer is a number.

\vspace{10mm}

\begin{verbatim}
> p = 60/100; p
[1] 0.6
\end{verbatim}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Carry out a test to answer the question}
\framesubtitle{Is there a difference in preference for the two blends?}

\pause

Start by stating the null hypothesis.

\pause

  \begin{itemize}
    \item $H_0: \theta=0.50$
    \item $H_1: \theta \neq 0.50$

\pause

    \item A case could be made for a one-sided test, but we'll stick with two-sided.

\pause

    \item $\alpha=0.05$ as usual.

\pause

    \item Central Limit Theorem says $\widehat{\theta}=\overline{Y}$ is approximately normal with mean $\theta$ and variance $\frac{\theta(1-\theta)}{n}$.
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Several valid test statistics for $H_0: \theta=\theta_0$ are available}
{Two of them are} % Which one do you like more? Why?

\begin{displaymath}
    Z_1 = \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta_0)}{\sqrt{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}}
\end{displaymath}

and

\begin{displaymath}
    Z_2 = \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta_0)}{\sqrt{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}}
\end{displaymath}

\vspace{10mm}

\pause

What is the critical value? Your answer is a number.

\begin{verbatim}
> alpha = 0.05
> qnorm(1-alpha/2)
[1] 1.959964
\end{verbatim}
\end{frame} 

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Calculate the test statistic and the $p$-value for each test}
% \framesubtitle{Note: The R code uses $p$ for the sample proportion}

\begin{verbatim}
> theta0 = .5; ybar = .6; n = 100
> Z1 = sqrt(n)*(ybar-theta0)/sqrt(theta0*(1-theta0)); Z1
[1] 2
> pval1 = 2 * (1-pnorm(Z1)); pval1
[1] 0.04550026
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim}
> Z2 = sqrt(n)*(ybar-theta0)/sqrt(ybar*(1-ybar)); Z2
[1] 2.041241
> pval2 = 2 * (1-pnorm(Z2)); pval2
[1] 0.04122683
\end{verbatim}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Conclusions}
%\framesubtitle{In symbols and words: Words are more important}

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Do you reject $H_0$? \pause \emph{Yes, just barely.}

\pause

    \item Isn't the $\alpha=0.05$ significance level pretty arbitrary?  \pause \emph{Yes, but if people insist on a Yes or No answer, this is what you give them.}

\pause

    \item What do you conclude, in symbols?  \pause $\theta \neq 0.50$. \emph{Specifically,} $\theta > 0.50$.

\pause

    \item What do you conclude, in plain language? Your answer is a statement about coffee.  \pause \emph{More consumers prefer the new blend of coffee beans.}

\pause

    \item Can you really draw directional conclusions when all you did was reject a non-directional null hypothesis? \pause
\emph{Yes. Decompose the two-sided size $\alpha$ test into two one-sided tests of size $\alpha/2$. This approach works in general.}
  \end{itemize}

\pause
  
It is very important to state directional conclusions, and state them clearly in terms of the subject matter. \textbf{Say what happened!} If you are asked state the conclusion in plain language, your answer \emph{must} be free of statistical mumbo-jumbo.
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{What about negative conclusions?}
\framesubtitle{What would you say if $Z=1.84$?}

\pause

Here are two possibilities, in plain language.

  \begin{itemize}
    \item ``This study does not provide clear evidence that consumers prefer one blend of coffee beans over the other."

\pause

    \item ``The results are consistent with no difference in preference for the two coffee bean blends."
  \end{itemize}
  
\vspace{5mm}

\pause
  
In this course, we will not just casually \emph{accept} the null hypothesis. 

% We are taking the side of Fisher over Neyman and Pearson in an old and very nasty theoretical dispute. 
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Confidence Intervals}
\framesubtitle{Approximately for large $n$,}

\pause

\begin{eqnarray*}
    1-\alpha & = & Pr\{ -z_{\alpha/2} < Z_2 < z_{\alpha/2} \} \\ \pause 
             & \approx &    Pr\left\{ -z_{\alpha/2} < \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta)}{\sqrt{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}} 
                      < z_{\alpha/2} \right\} \\ \pause 
             & = &    Pr\left\{ \overline{Y} - z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}} < \theta <
                                \overline{Y} +  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}} \right\} 
\end{eqnarray*}

\pause

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Could express this as $\overline{Y} \pm  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}}$ \pause 
    \item $z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}}$ is sometimes called the \emph{margin of error}.
    \item If $\alpha=0.05$, it's the 95\% margin of error.
  \end{itemize}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Give a 95\% confidence interval for the taste test data.}
\framesubtitle{The answer is a pair of numbers. Show some work.}

\pause

\begin{eqnarray*}
      & & \left(\overline{y} - z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{y}(1-\overline{y})}{n}} ~~,~~
                \overline{y} + z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{y}(1-\overline{y})}{n}} \right) \\
      & &                                                       \\
      &=&  \left(0.60 - 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.6\times 0.4}{100}} ~~,~~
                 0.60 + 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.6\times 0.4}{100}} \right) \\
      & &                                                       \\
      &=&  (0.504,0.696)
\end{eqnarray*}

\pause

In a report, you could say 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item The estimated proportion preferring the new coffee bean blend is $0.60 \pm 0.096$, or
    \item ``Sixty percent of consumers preferred the new blend. These results are expected to be accurate within 10 percentage points, 19 times out of 20."
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Meaning of the confidence interval}
  \begin{itemize}
    \item We calculated a 95\% confidence interval of $(0.504,0.696)$ for $\theta$.
    \item Does this mean $Pr\{ 0.504 < \theta < 0.696 \}=0.95$?

\pause

    \item No! The quantities $0.504$, $0.696$ and  $\theta$ are all constants, so $Pr\{ 0.504 < \theta < 0.696 \}$ is either zero or one. 

\pause
 
    \item The endpoints of the confidence interval are random variables, and the numbers $0.504$ and $0.696$ are \emph{realizations} of those random variables, arising from a particular random sample.

\pause

    \item Meaning of the probability statement: If we were to calculate an interval in this manner for a large number of random samples, the interval would contain the true parameter around $95\%$ of the time. 

\pause

    \item So we sometimes say that we are ``$95\%$ confident" that $0.504 < \theta < 0.696$.
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Confidence intervals (regions) correspond to tests}
\framesubtitle{Recall $Z_1 = \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta_0)} {\sqrt{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}}$ and $Z_2 = \frac{\sqrt{n} (\overline{Y}-\theta_0)}{\sqrt{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}}$.}

\pause

From the derivation of the confidence interval, 

\begin{displaymath}
    -z_{\alpha/2} < Z_2 < z_{\alpha/2}
\end{displaymath}
if and only if
\begin{displaymath}
\overline{Y} - z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}} < \theta_0 < \overline{Y} +  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}{n}}
\end{displaymath}

\pause


  \begin{itemize}
    \item So the confidence interval consists of those parameter values $\theta_0$ for which $H_0: \theta=\theta_0$ is \emph{not} rejected. \pause
    \item That is, the null hypothesis is rejected at significance level $\alpha$ if and only if the value given by the null hypothesis is outside the $(1-\alpha)\times 100\%$ confidence interval. \pause
    \item There is a confidence interval corresponding to $Z_1$ too. 
    \item In general, any test can be inverted to obtain a confidence region.
  \end{itemize}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Selecting sample size}

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Where did that $n=100$ come from?
    \item Probably off the top of someone's head.
    \item We can (and should) be more systematic.

\pause

    \item Sample size can be selected
         \begin{itemize}
             \item To achieve a desired margin of error
             \item To achieve a desired statistical power
             \item In other reasonable ways
         \end{itemize}
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Power}

The power of a test is the probability of rejecting $H_0$ when $H_0$ is false.

\pause

  \begin{itemize}
    \item More power is good. \pause
    \item Power is not just one number. It is a \emph{function} of the parameter(s). 

\pause

    \item Usually, 
         \begin{itemize}
             \item For any $n$, the more incorrect $H_0$ is, the greater the power.
             \item For any parameter value satisfying the alternative hypothesis, the larger $n$ is, the greater the power.
         \end{itemize}
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Statistical power analysis}
\framesubtitle{To select sample size}

\pause

  \begin{itemize}
    \item Pick an effect you'd like to be able to detect -- a parameter value such that $H_0$ is false.  It should be just over the boundary of interesting and meaningful. \pause
    \item Pick a desired power, a probability with which you'd like to be able to detect the effect by rejecting the null hypothesis. \pause
    \item Start with a fairly small $n$ and calculate the power.   Increase the sample size until the desired power is reached.
  \end{itemize}

\pause

\vspace{5mm}
There are two main issues.
\vspace{5mm}

  \begin{itemize}
    \item What is an ``interesting" or ``meaningful" parameter value?
    \item How do you calculate the probability of rejecting $H_0$?
  \end{itemize}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Calculating power for the $Z_1$ test of a single proportion}
\framesubtitle{True parameter value is $\theta$}

\pause

%\begin{displaymath}
%    Z_2 = \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta_0)}{\sqrt{\overline{Y}(1-\overline{Y})}}
%\end{displaymath}

{\tiny
\begin{eqnarray*}
    \mbox{Power} &=& 1-Pr\{-z_{\alpha/2} < Z_1 < z_{\alpha/2} \} \\ \pause 
                 &=& 1-Pr\left\{-z_{\alpha/2} < 
                     \frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta_0)}{\sqrt{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}} 
                    < z_{\alpha/2} \right\} \\ \pause 
                 && \\
                 &=& \ldots \\ \pause 
                 && \\
                 &=& 1-Pr\left\{\frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} -  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} 
~~~<~~~ {\color{red}\frac{\sqrt{n}(\overline{Y}-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} }  \right. \\
                 & & \hspace{8mm} < \left. \frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} +  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} \right\}\\ \pause 
         &\approx&  1 - \Phi\left( \frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} +  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} \right) 
                       + \Phi\left( \frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} -  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} \right),
\end{eqnarray*}
}  

where $\Phi(\cdot)$ is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal.
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{An R function to calculate approximate power}
\framesubtitle{For the $Z_1$ test of a single proportion}

{\scriptsize
\begin{displaymath}
    \mbox{Power} = 1 - \Phi\left( \frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} +  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} \right) 
                       + \Phi\left( \frac{\sqrt{n}(\theta_0-\theta)}{\sqrt{\theta(1-\theta)}} -  z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\theta_0(1-\theta_0)}{\theta(1-\theta)}} \right)
\end{displaymath}
}

{\footnotesize
\begin{verbatim}
Z1power = function(theta,n,theta0=0.50,alpha=0.05)
    {
    a = sqrt(n)*(theta0-theta)/sqrt(theta*(1-theta))
    b = qnorm(1-alpha/2) * sqrt(theta0*(1-theta0)/(theta*(1-theta)))
    Z1power = 1 - pnorm(a+b) + pnorm(a-b)
    Z1power
    } # End of function Z1power

> Z1power(theta=0.50,n=100) # Should be alpha = 0.05
[1] 0.05

\end{verbatim}
} 

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Some numerical examples}

\begin{verbatim}
> Z1power(0.55,100)
[1] 0.168788
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim}
> Z1power(0.60,100)
[1] 0.5163234
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim}
> Z1power(0.65,100)
[1] 0.8621995
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim} 
> Z1power(0.40,100)
[1] 0.5163234
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim} 
> Z1power(0.55,500)
[1] 0.6093123
\end{verbatim}
\pause
\begin{verbatim}
> Z1power(0.55,1000)
[1] 0.8865478
\end{verbatim}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Find smallest sample size needed to detect $\theta=0.60$ as different from $\theta_0=0.50$ with probability at least 0.80}

\begin{verbatim}
> samplesize = 1; power=0
> while(power < 0.80)
+ {
+ samplesize = samplesize+1
+ power = Z1power(theta=0.60,n=samplesize)
+ }
> 
> samplesize
[1] 194
> power
[1] 0.8003138

\end{verbatim}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{Conclusions from the power analysis}
\framesubtitle{Assuming true $\theta=0.60$} 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Power of 0.52 with $n=100$ is pathetic.
    \item As Fisher said, ``To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."
    \item $n=200$ is better.
        \begin{verbatim}
> Z1power(theta=0.60,n=200)
[1] 0.8122918
        \end{verbatim}
    \item What sample size is required for power of 90\%?
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}[fragile]
\frametitle{What sample size is needed for a power of 90\%?}
\begin{verbatim}
> # Find sample size needed for power = 0.90
> samplesize = 1; power=0
> while(power < 0.90)
+ {
+ samplesize = samplesize+1
+ power = Z1power(theta=0.60,n=samplesize)
+ }
> 
> samplesize
[1] 259
> power
[1] 0.9005493
\end{verbatim}

\end{frame} 


\begin{frame}
\frametitle{What is required of the scientist}
\framesubtitle{Who wants to select sample size by power analysis}

The scientist must specify 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item Parameter values that he or she wants to be able to detect as different from $H_0$ value.
    \item Desired power (probability of detection)
  \end{itemize}

\vspace{20mm}

It's not always easy for a scientist to think in terms of the parameters of a statistical model.

\end{frame}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Copyright Information}

This slide show was prepared by  \href{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner}{Jerry Brunner},
Department of Statistics, University of Toronto. It is licensed under a 
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US}
     {Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License}. Use any part of it as you like and share the result freely. The \LaTeX~source code is available from the course website:
\href{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/oldclass/appliedf13} {\footnotesize \texttt{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/$^\sim$brunner/oldclass/appliedf13}}

\end{frame}


\end{document}



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{}
%\framesubtitle{} 
  \begin{itemize}
    \item 
    \item 
    \item 
  \end{itemize}
\end{frame}



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Z1power = function(theta,n,theta0=0.50,alpha=0.05)
    {
    a = sqrt(n)*(theta0-theta)/sqrt(theta*(1-theta))
    b = qnorm(1-alpha/2) * sqrt(theta0*(1-theta0)/(theta*(1-theta)))
    Z1power = 1 - pnorm(a+b) + pnorm(a-b)
    Z1power
    } # End of function Z1power


Z2power = function(theta,n,theta0=0.50,alpha=0.05)
    {
    effect = sqrt(n)*(theta0-theta)/sqrt(theta*(1-theta))
    z = qnorm(1-alpha/2) 
    Z2power = 1 - pnorm(effect+z) + pnorm(effect-z)
    Z2power
    } # End of function Z2power


# Find sample size needed for power = 0.90
samplesize = 1; power = 0
while(power < 0.90)
{
samplesize = samplesize+1
power = Z2power(theta=0.60,n=samplesize)
}
samplesize
power



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Notes and comments

Cut out non-central chisq part, added nice what's a model, parameter space
Non-central chisq is in 2012 version.