STA431: Structural Equation Models

University of Toronto Mississauga, Fall or Winter/Spring 1999

http://utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/431s15

Lecture: Monday 11:10 - 1:00 and Wednesday 11:10 - 12:00 in IB 210

Note: Jerry does not read his email every day. It is much more efficient to talk with him before or after class, or during office hours.

Tutorial: Friday 2:10-3:00 in IB 235

Text: Structural equation models: An open textbook by J. Brunner. This is a draft. The first part is posted on the course website. Material in the text overlaps with lectures.

Topics: Regression with random explanatory variables, Latent variables, Reliability, Regression with measurement error, Parameter identifiability, Exploratory factor analysis, Confirmatory factor analysis, Path analysis, The general structural model. SAS proc calis will be used.

Prerequisites: STA302. The calendar says STA258 but that is a typo. STA258 is not sufficient.

Grading: Marks will be based on quizzes in tutorial, two term tests and a final exam.

      Quizzes: 24%
      Term Test One    20%
      Term Test Two    20%
      Final Exam 36%

There will be nine quizzes. They will be given in tutorial on January 16, 23, February 6, 13, 27, March 6, 20, 27 and April 6. The lowest quiz mark will be dropped.

There will be an assignment for each quiz. The knowledge you need to do each quiz is a subset of the knowledge you need to do the corresponding assignment. Except for the first assignment (which is most review), most assignments will include a computer part. You will bring printouts to the quiz and answer questions based on the printouts. Possibly, one of the quiz questions will be to hand in a printout. The non-computer parts of the assignments are just to prepare you for the quizzes; they will never be handed in.

The term tests will be given in lecture on February 2nd and March 16th. They will be based closely on the homework. There will be no computer assignments for the term tests.

In spite of the 36% weighting of the final exam, a good performance on the final can save a student from failing the course. Suppose your average including the final exam is less than 50%. If your mark on the final exam is at least 70%, or your mark on the final is at the class median or above, then you get a mark of 50% for the course. This rule is intended to give hope to those who have messed up on the term tests and quizzes, and encourage them to study for the final exam.

Policy for missed work: If you miss a quiz or term test without a valid excuse, the mark is zero. However, your lowest quiz mark will be dropped. If you miss a quiz with a valid excuse, your mark on the final exam (out of 10) will be substituted for the missing quiz mark, and the lowest remaining mark will still be dropped.

If you miss a term test with a valid excuse, your mark on the final exam will be substituted for the missing test mark. This is dangerous, because it means the final exam will count for 56% of your mark.

If you believe you have a valid excuse for missing term work, please see Jerry (not the TA) in person during office hours or before or after class. Note that according to university policy, your absence must be declared on ROSI on the day of the absence if your excuse is to be considered.

But what is a valid excuse? Here are some guidelines. If you miss a quiz for medical reasons, you must submit a University of Toronto Medical Certificate (not just a note), available at

http://www.illnessverification.utoronto.ca.

The certificate must include the statement that you were unable to write the test or quiz for medical reasons. If the certificate does not clearly state that you were unable to function, the excuse will not be accepted. Documentation must show that the physician was consulted on the day of the quiz, or on the next day. A statement merely confirming a report of illness made by the student is not acceptable.

On the other extreme, automotive breakdown or other transportation problems are never valid excuses. If you miss term work because you are taking another class at the same time as this one, that is not a valid excuse. The printer jammed, my dog ate it, etc. fall into the same category. If the University is officially open, weather is a valid excuse only if more than 50% of the class miss the quiz.

Academic honesty: It an academic offence to present someone else's work as your own, or to allow your work to be copied for this purpose. To repeat: the person who allows her/his work to be copied is equally guilty, and subject to disciplinary action by the university.

It is fine to discuss the assignments and to learn from each other, but there are clear limits on what is acceptable. It is okay to discuss the meaning of the question. It is okay to discuss general principles related to the question. It is okay, and encouraged, to discuss examples from lecture or textbook that are similar to the question. It is okay to reveal your approach to solving a problem (not the details), but only to somebody who has tried the problem and is really stuck. Even then, it is better to ask questions (like "Well, what's the null hypothesis?" Or "The problem is asking whether this estimator is unbiased. So, what's an unbiased estimator?") instead of just giving your answer. A good rule is to never help someone who hasn't started yet.

Here are some guidelines that apply to the computer assignments. If there is a problem with plagiarism, it will probably happen here, since computer assignments may be handed in.

Accessibility Needs: We are committed to accessibility. If you require accommodations for a disability, or have any accessibility concerns about the course, the classroom or course materials, please contact Jerry or Accessibility Services (visit http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/accessability or email accessconfirm.utm@utoronto.ca) as soon as possible.