\documentclass[12pt]{article} 
%\usepackage{amsbsy} % for \boldsymbol and \pmb 
\usepackage{graphicx} % To include pdf files!
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{amsfonts} % for \mathbb{R} The set of reals
\usepackage[colorlinks=true, pdfstartview=FitV, linkcolor=blue, citecolor=blue, urlcolor=blue]{hyperref} % For links
\usepackage{fullpage}
%\pagestyle{empty} % No page numbers


\begin{document}
%\enlargethispage*{1000 pt} 

\begin{center}   
{\Large \textbf{STA 302f15 Assignment Ten}}\footnote{Copyright information is at the end of the last page.}
\vspace{1 mm}
\end{center}

\noindent
 Problem~\ref{trees} uses R. Please bring your printout for Problem~\ref{trees} to the quiz. \textbf{Do not write anything on the printout in advance of the quiz, except possibly your name and student number.} The other questions are preparation for the quiz, and are not to be handed in. 

\begin{enumerate} 

\item Based on the general linear model with normal error terms,
\begin{enumerate}
    \item Prove the $t$ distribution given on the formula sheet for a new observation $y_0$. Use earlier material on the formula sheet. For example, how do you know numerator and denominator are independent?
    \item Derive the $(1-\alpha)\times 100\%$ prediction interval for a new observation from this population, in which the independent variable values are given in $\mathbf{x}_0$. ``Derive" means show the High School algebra.
\end{enumerate}

\item  
A forestry company has developed a regression equation for predicting the amount of useable wood that they will get from a tree, based on a set of measurements that can be taken without cutting the tree down. They are convinced that a model with normal error terms is right. They have $\widehat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}$ and $MSE$ based on a set of $n$ trees they measured first and then cut down, and they know how to calculate a predicted $y$ and a prediction interval for the amount of wood they will get from a single tree. 

But that's not what they want. They have a set of $m$ more trees they are planning to cut down, and they have measured several independent variables for each tree, yielding $\mathbf{x_{n+1} \ldots, \mathbf{x}_{n+m}}$. What they want is a prediction of the \emph{total} amount of wood they will get from these trees, along with a $95\%$ prediction interval for the total.
    \begin{enumerate}
        \item The quantity they want to predict is $W = \sum_{j=n+1}^{n+m}y_j$, where $y_j = \mathbf{x}_j^\prime\boldsymbol{\beta} + \epsilon_j$. What is the distribution of $W$? You can just write down the answer without showing any work. 
        \item Let $\widehat{W}$ denote the prediction of $W$. It is calculated using the company's regression data along with $\mathbf{x_{n+1} \ldots, \mathbf{x}_{n+k}}$. Give a formula for $\widehat{W}$. 
        \item What is the distribution of $W-\widehat{W}$? Show your work, but don't use moment-generating functions. Just write down expected value and calculate the variance.
        \item Now standardize $W-\widehat{W}$ to obtain a standard normal. Call it $Z$. 
        \item Divide $Z$ by the square root of a chi-squared random variable, divided by its degrees of freedom, and simplify. Call it $T$. What are the degrees of freedom? 
        \item How do you know that numerator and denominator are independent?
        \item Using your formula for $T$, derive the $(1-\alpha)\times 100\%$ prediction interval for $W$. Please use the symbol $t_{\alpha/2}$ for the critical value.
    \end{enumerate}


\item \label{trees} This question uses the \texttt{trees} data you saw in the R lecture (``Least squares with R"). Start by fitting a model with just \texttt{Girth} and \texttt{Height}. 

The forestry company wants to predict the volume of wood they would obtain if they cut down three particular trees. The first tree has a girth of 11.0 and a height of 75. The second tree has a girth of 14.8 and a height of 80. The third tree has a girth of 10.5 and a height of 65. Using R,
    \begin{enumerate}
        \item Calculate a predicted amount of wood the company will obtain by cutting down these trees. The answer is a number.
        \item Calculate a 95\% prediction interval for the total amount of wood. The answer is a pair of numbers, a lower prediction limit and an upper prediction limit.
    \end{enumerate}


\item \label{cat1} In  
a study comparing the effectiveness of different weight loss diets, volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two diets ($A$ or $B$) or put on a waiting list and advised to lose weight on their own. Participants were weighed before and after 6 months of participation in the program (or 6 months of being on the waiting list). The response variable is weight \emph{loss}. The explanatory variables are age and treatment group. 
            \begin{enumerate}
                \item Write the regression equation, starting with $y_i = \beta_0 + \ldots$. Your model should have parallel regression lines for the different treatment groups, and notice that it \emph{does have an intercept}. Please use $x$ for age. You don't have to say how your dummy variables are defined. You'll do that in the next part.
                                
                \item Make a table with three rows, showing how you would set up indicator dummy variables for treatment group. Also give $E(Y|x)$ in the last column. See lecture slide shows for examples.

                \item In terms of $\beta$ values, what null hypothesis would you test to find out whether, allowing for age, the three diets (including Wait List) differ in their effectiveness?

                \item In terms of $\beta$ values, what null hypothesis would you test to find out whether, allowing for age, diets $A$ and $B$ differ in their effectiveness?

                \item In terms of $\beta$ values, what null hypothesis would you test to find out whether 25 year old participants who spend six months on the Wait list ``diet" have any average tendency to gain or lose weight? Remember, $Y$ is weight loss.

            \end{enumerate} 

\item Now please repeat Question~\ref{cat1} with \emph{cell means coding}. That's the dummy variable coding scheme with no $\beta_0$, and an indicator dummy variable for each diet (including Wait List).

\end{enumerate}

% \vspace{70mm}

\noindent
\begin{center}\begin{tabular}{l}
\hspace{6in} \\ \hline
\end{tabular}\end{center}
This assignment was prepared by  \href{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner}{Jerry Brunner},
Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto. It is licensed under a 
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US}
     {Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License}. Use any part of it as you like and share the result freely. The \LaTeX~source code is available from the course website:
\href{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/~brunner/oldclass/302f15} {\small\texttt{http://www.utstat.toronto.edu/$^\sim$brunner/oldclass/302f15}}

\end{document}